Eggs-A Parable of following through the dinosaur goes on until the whole egg!
Ever had one of those moments in which he realized that just lost a great opportunity? Well let me tell you about my past. I went hiking with a close friend last Saturday. In fact are the horses and went for about an hour and a half to this beautiful canyon in western Utah, right on the edge of the western desert.
The road will take to the canyon width and tapas in a saddle about 6,300 feet. Since then, the world just fades into the background of the valley in the rightmost the view is amazing.
We walked from there to the anther 2,000 feet or less. When we started the descent I looked down and found a rock that seemed a dinosaur egg. The egg was put in some slate and it looked exactly like an egg that had been divided in half so you could see inside the egg. Now I am not a paleontologist, so I'm not positive it was a dinosaur egg, but I thought my wife and my children who take advantage of it. So I threw the rock in my backpack and headed home.
When I got home I showed my wife and I was so excited, but never going to believe what he said, "Where is the other half? "
I said: "What?"
"Well," my wife said: "It's like you're walking and found a ticket half a million dollars. It's good, but it would have been much better than the other half! "
I have to admit that I laughed quite difficult on the whole thing, but my wife brought a very valid point. How many times have you ever seen something and thought, "Wow that is amazing!" You grabbed him, but then forgot to do the other half. How to start your education, but never completed, from a project but get distracted halfway, writing your goals, but then do nothing with the list?
I encourage you not to stop halfway. Continue until the whole egg!
About the Author
For this and other articles by Tyrell Gray please visit www.mymark.com/blog/tyrellgray. Tyrell Gray is Chief Evangelist and Founder of MyMark www.mymark.com and real estate investment expert. To learn more about Tyrell Gray please visit www.mymark.com/tyrellgray.
This original post can be found at http://www.mymark.com/blog/tyrellgray/2010/10/27/dinosaur-eggs-a-parable-of-following-through/
How many times bigger is the largest dinosaur of a chicken egg?
In terms of volume: The largest dinosaur eggs discovered are about a foot long and are probably of sauropods (the largest dinosaurs): Hypselosaurus, an egg 100 million, of France, liquid capacity of about 6 liters, the egg measures 1 foot long (30 cm) by 10 (25 cm) wide. A chicken egg is about 2 ounces. 6 pints = 96 ounces, which means about 48 chicken eggs. So the largest dinosaur egg is approximately 48 times larger in volume of a chicken egg.
The Little Cook Pig Kitchen Timer
Watch the piggy make his way around the timer as your cookies bake in the oven! This timer sets for 60 minutes and is a great way for kids to learn the value of measuring time, not only in cooking, but also in managing homework assignments or even a time-out! Wind the timer all the way to 60 and then turn back to the desired time. A ring will tell you it's time to...
Yes, that's a former Beatle in caveman costume for this more-dumb-than-funny 1981 comedy about a prehistoric misfit (Ringo Starr) who recruits other misfits to start a new tribe. The jokes about flatulence and sex are banal, but the cast of then-unfamiliar faces is fun to watch from the perspective of history. The best thing going are some dinosaur special effects, though Ringo might argue meeting...
Laurie Berkner serves up a heaping helping of whacked-out, slaphappy lyrics and get-you-moving acoustic guitar licks. The littlest listeners will want to slip on their dancing shoes for such originals as the opening track, "We Are the Dinosaurs," on which a pack of prehistorics prance around, stopping only to eat their food when they're in the mood and take a rest over in their nest. The blues-soa...
We hope you identified the Dinosaur Egg you have been looking for today. We show a large range of gemstones such as Dinosaur Egg on our site. Everyday we scour the internet to locate the best deals for Dinosaur Egg and other gems using our web portals. If for any reason you can"t find what you were searching for today, check out our other pages and categories on the right hand side or use the search box. Thank you for visiting gemstone store.
The perfect theme gift for you or someone special in your life. The abstract expression on each piece, helps make each morning sip, savored. Each piece is hand etched and hand painted stoneware in Mara's abstract, southwest style. Choose from over 200 themes and designs. You can view all this artist designs in the link below, Same Artist Pieces.Details: Each mug holds about 16 ounces. Each piece i...
This Mara Stoneware Collection Mug is for ONE mug only and holds a capacity of 16 ounces and would make a wonderful gift to give or receive on any occasion. Each piece has been fired twice at high temperatures and they are completely finished by hand. Natural variations in the shape, color and etched designs give each piece a unique personality. Use these beautiful, whimsical and durable wares for...
This set of four mugs plus a free countertop four mug post stack from the MARA STONEWARE COLLECTION would make a wonderful gift to give or receive on any occasion. Each piece has been fired twice at high temperatures and they are completely finished by hand. Natural variations in the shape, color and etched designs give each piece a unique personality. Use these beautiful, whimsical and durable wa...
Here's a righteous romp through the free-spirited L.A. ska-punk pioneers' history. This two-CD set features a well-chosen best-of disc that pulls prime cuts such as "Party at Ground Zero" and "U.G.L.Y" (from Fishbone's mercurial 1985 debut), "Bonin' in the Boneyard" and "Freddie's Dead" (from 1988's Truth and Soul), "Everyday Sunshine" and "Sunless Saturday" (from 1991's The Reality of My Surround...
WallMonkeys wall graphics are printed on the highest quality re-positionable, self-adhesive fabric paper. Each order is printed in-house and on-demand. WallMonkeys uses premium materials & state-of-the-art production technologies. Our white fabric material is superior to vinyl decals. You can literally see and feel the difference. Our wall graphics apply in minutes and won't damage your paint or l...
We hope you identified the Fossil Fish specimen you have been looking for today on our site. We show a large range of minerals and fossils such as Fossil Fish on our site. Everyday we search the internet to locate the best deals for Fossil Fish and other gems using our web portals. If for any reason you can"t find what you were searching for today at Noarmans's Rocks and gems, then check out our other pages and categories on the right hand side for great deals on other fossils and rock specimens.
Virtually all children and adults will most likely find the subject of dinosaurs fascinating and intriguing. Learn about of dinosaurs stretches our imaginations and allows us to experience a world very different from our own today. It seems that the more we learn about these creatures impressive, the more we want to learn. Learn more about these prehistoric creatures that lived on Earth for 165 million years, traveling in these dinosaurs inspired crafts, activities, games and other resources.
Dinosaur Egg In a bowl mix some flour and water until a liquid paste. Tear a newspaper into small strips. Place an inflated balloon on top of a cup or small bowl from tipping over. Dip and enjoy the newspaper strips into the paste and remove excess paste. Place the strips on the globe. Overlapping strips until the entire globe is completely covered. Apply three or four layers and let dry. When strips are completely dry, let your child paint the egg.
Dinosaur bones Painting Spray a series of small white dog bones. Place in a shallow rectangular baking dish and covered with clean sand or earth. Tell your child to pretend he / she is a paleontologist and he / she will be the excavation of Dinosaur Fossils. Because dinosaurs are extinct, you should examine and study these fossils to understand the history of this fascinating group of animals. Explain that the bones and the ground around the dinosaurs to tell us when the dinosaurs died and what the weather was like when they lived. Only the excavation of fossils can take years! Providing children with tools such as shovels digging toy small, brushes, sticks, etc.
Dinosaur Activity Make two identical sets pictures of dinosaurs. (You can find large dinosaurs on our site templates or coloring books.) Put the photos facedown on a table or on the floor and mix. Ask your child to turn over an image. Then have him / her to turn over another picture to try to find his game. If the two images do not match, ask your child to turn the images over and try again. Play until all the images match.
FossilsCrafts dinosaur Have the kids make footprints in clay coin or leaves. Explain how this is very similar to how dinosaur fossils were made. Bones made footprints in the mud. This mud hardened and became a rock or stone. When the stone or the stone breaks the seal remains in place. Explain that we can learn about dinosaurs through fossils.
Dino, Dino, who has a bone? Have your child close his eyes. Hide the Dinosaur Bone. (A dog bone chew toy dinosaur bone makes good.) Say: "Dino, Dino, who has your bone, somebody stole it from her house. Guess Who! "Have your child try to find the bone.
Dinosaur Salad Explain that many dinosaurs were herbivores. Talk to your child fruits and vegetables are parts of plants. Provide a variety of fruits and vegetables. Peel and cut fruit and vegetables and place in a bowl. Mix. Serve on a paper plate. Ask your child to eat their fruit or vegetable salad like the dinosaurs might have-no hands. Some fruits and vegetables suggested, bananas, apples, grapes, oranges, cantaloupe, watermelon, strawberries, lettuce, carrots, broccoli and cauliflower.
Dinosaur Dance Discuss different ways the dinosaurs moved. Walk slowly like a Triceratops, run fast as a Compsognathus, etc. Play some instrumental music and let your child to move or dance around like a dinosaur.
Build your own dinosaur in the sand! This is really a unique idea for a dinosaur toy. It contains 10 plastic molds which are perfect for any sandbox or sand and water table. When finished, it looks just like the dinosaur was recently covered by blowing and drifting sand. The 10 pcs. are together inside of one net bag....
A visit to a dinosaur dig turns exciting when the Magic School Bus becomes a time machine that takes Ms. Frizzle's class back 67 million years, to the time when dinosaurs roamed the Earth. There, they must put aside their prejudices and preconceptions about dinosaurs, as they investigate which are dangerous carnivores, and which are herbivores. By noting their observations in their science journal...
Follow the dinosaur trail out west to the wide open spaces of America. In the 1870's a "bone rush" led to amazing scenes as fossil-hunters risked life and limb in their quest for dinosaur remains. Nowadays, dino-detection is an exact science, but the discoveries are just as exciting. Ultrasaurus, for example, next to which man is only knee-high to a grasshopper!...
We hope you identified the Dinosaur fossil you have been looking for today. We show a large range of gemstones such as Dinosaur fossil on our site. Everyday we scour the internet to locate the best deals for Dinosaur fossil and other gems using our web portals. If for any reason you can"t find what you were searching for today, check out our other pages and categories on the right hand side or use the search box. Thank you for visiting gemstone store.
Amber Rose: Private Vintage Sunglasses Appointment With The Vintage Frames Company
Antique and vintage lamps - Through the Looking Glass
There is something timeless about glass. Can complement both traditional homes and also spaces ultra-modern. antique crystal lamps can bring a real sense of elegance and luxury to any interior design. antique lamps can be functional, attractive and aesthetically pleasing. Can illuminate any room in your home and are available in a wide range of different styles and designs.
Antique glass Tiffany lamps
When most people think of ancient lamps think of Tiffany glass. Louis Comfort Tiffany glass design was first to set up a business creating handmade items made of glass (known as Favrile) in the 1890's. Tiffany experimented with many different designs of glass but is most famous for its iconic ancient stained glass lamps.
These lamps are renowned for their quality and beauty and are still highly collectible today. Some of the designs extremely valuable and rare are found only in museums or private collections specialist. antique Tiffany lamps sell for thousands regularly at auction and some of the rarest pieces can reach million dollar price tags.
But the factory produced a lot Tiffany lamps during the height of production and there are plenty of affordable options still out there to buy. You can pick up some authentic Tiffany lamps old glass of a few hundred pounds and some very good replicas even more affordable.
Old Wright Lamps glass
Another designer collection of ancient glass is Frank Lloyd Wright. Is associated with the Prairie "and architecture" mission " and design schools. This is part of Arts and Crafts movement and has become very collectible in recent years. Wright glass antique lamps tend to have a solid appearance with distinctive geometric patterns and lines. Typically, bases are formed from wood, metal or ceramic and the colors are subdued. With a real lamp Frank Lloyd Wright designed, expect to spend money!
Reverse painted lamps
During in early 1900 reverse painted glass lamps were popular. This was a method that involved a hand painted design on the inside of a white glass shade. Normally these remarkable landscapes popular designs. The shadow was fired in an oven then set the paint on the glass. Top reverse painted lamp manufacturers this time are Handel, Jefferson, Pittsburgh Bridges and Moe.
The collection of examples of reverse painted antique lamps are known as 'bloated' styles. These were created by the point of manufacturer and have two distinctive designs of molded glass (flowers symbolized in most cases) that seem to puff outward.
Slag glass lamps
This is another collection crystal chandelier from the beginning 1900. These lamps are very popular among the middle classes and are commonly sold by the gas and electricity companies. Slag glass lamps are made by hand, first the design of corrugated metal frames. The glass panels are provided below, in the frames using both methods of cutting and gouging. In many cases, metal structure is designed to overlay glass and style to create highlights.
Normally slag glass lamps were made Handmade glass amber or caramel color, but there are some good examples in shades of blue, pink and green. The best manufacturers of the early 19 include Handel, Bradley and Hubbard, Edward Miller & Co. and the Empire Brass Lamp and Mfg.Co.
Antique Glass Lamp Tips shopping
When you are buying any antique lamps, it is important to do your research and know what to look for. Always get a second opinion if you are unsure about the authenticity of a piece. Use a reputable dealer will be happy to assist you with any questions you may have. Here are some essential tips to help you buy antique crystal chandeliers for your home:
• You can not rely solely One piece of evidence in the search for authenticity. Many original designs as slag glass lamps, the manufacturer will not have a brand and those who do as old Tiffany lamps can be easily forged. You have to research the type of ancient lamps want to buy and be able to use multiple identification factors to help judge the authenticity aa.
• Think carefully about whether you want to show their age lamps, decorative pieces or as purely functional items. Some old colored-glass lamps that can not be from the lighting so you may need to consider using them more decorative pieces and the search for other lighting solutions for their rooms. If you want the lamp as a functional piece then recheck is fully operational before buying.
• The base and shade can not both be original. Is the basic common to be replaced for damage or personal preferences in recent years. You can do a little research and testing see what kind of base has been produced with the kind of antique lamps that are interested watch for any signs of an exchange as if the screen Lamp looks a bit too big / small for the base or point is newer / older than the other.
· Check glass work much Care for any cracks, chips or replaced parts / panels. This can devalue antique lamps and can be costly to repair.
There are some beautiful old glass lamps widely available in the market. They can brighten up your interior design and build features impressive in his room. The good thing about antique lamps, is that it can be practical and feature articles as well as being very decorative.
About the Author
Maurice Robertson, principal of The Antique and Vintage Table Lamp Co, has had a lifetime's association with antique porcelain and pottery, with his commercial experience spanning a period of over 45 years,including valuer to the Australian Government's Incentive to the Arts Scheme. He has extended his ceramics expertise into the quality table lamps seen on the company's site and is well known to local and international interior designers who have included many of his table lamps in their projects. He has also supplied items of national interest to the official Sydney residence of the Australian Prime Minister.
The Antique and Vintage Table Lamp Co specialise in antique lamps with an exclusive on-line range of over 100 unique lamps.
Lamps are shipped ready wired for the US, the UK and Australia.
For further information you are invited to visit their web site at -:
We found a mine of bottles in the backyard .... This is amazing. I suppose from soda bottles and other foods is one of them. I would say hundreds of them being very common. Description amber glass screw-top Brown (silver and black) bottle seam (two sizes) between 9 and 12 inches a glass late higher the lower half of the top with three rings of glass that separates them.
I absolutely hate. I <3 old bottles. you should check out a vintage store or online site ...
Add a little pizzazz to your kitchen with this beautiful jewel color glass gourmet oil bottle. Chic and contemporary design is a delight to display and use, whether you're cooking in the kitchen, seasoning salads at the table. Use to serve and store olive oil, balsamic vinegar or soy sauce. Decorative shape fits more comfortably in your hand for better control when pouring. Stainless steel pour sp...
Unique olive oil & vinegar jewel colored glass dispenser bottles. The olive oil & vinegar liquid dispenser bottles come with black iron stand and stainless spouts. Use to serve & store olive oil, balsamic vinegar or soy sauce. These beautiful jewel color glass gourmet vinegar oil bottles will add a little pizzazz to your kitchen. Chic and contemporary in design they are a delight to display and us...
The feisty buggers drum up all kinds of mischievous antics at school this time. This program features 15 funny episodes from the well loved family animated series....
We hope you identified the Vintage Amber you have been looking for today. We show a large range of gemstones such as Vintage Amber on our site. Everyday we scour the internet to locate the best deals for Vintage Amber and other gems using our web portals. If for any reason you can"t find what you were searching for today, check out our other pages and categories on the right hand side or use the search box. Thank you for visiting gemstone store.
How do 18 versions of the Bible translate the word: Strange women-1?
This is the eleventh article of the series: "Women of Abroad in the Bible against the Quran "
In previous articles, we have seen that from the point of view of language, the "foreign" women is foreign or exotic or alien women. However, the Bible has another idea.
As confirmed by the Bible, the "foreign" woman is not Jewish Women or non-Jewish woman.
As a result, any non-Jewish or non-Jewish woman is a "foreign" woman.
This indicates that women in the Bible are only one of two categories, but are either legitimate (true) or overseas (foreign).
In this article, we will analyze and discuss the translation of one verse that speaks of the "strange woman" in 18 different versions of the Bible. Although this issue be a bit of patience and vigilance, however, that deserves further study to show how enormously the translators of some Bible versions did their work in reference to Scripture Hebrew.
Very simply, the verse 1 Kings 11:1 says, "and King Solomon loved many foreign women along with the daughter of Pharaoh, women of the Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites Sidon, and the Hittites. "
It is a very clear and simple statement which needs only one who knows Hebrew and English to translate it as it is.
However, the intelligent reader will see here what the translators of 18 Bible versions have been made to translate this verse, 1 Kings 11:1.
Contemporary English Version translates 1 Kings 11 as follows:
"The Lord did not want the Israelites to worship foreign gods, so they had been warned not to marry someone who was not of Israel. Solomon loved his wife, daughter the king of Egypt. But he also said that some women of Moab, Ammon and Edom, Sidon and other land of the Hittites. "
The stresses the statement is not found in the original Hebrew Scriptures (Tanakh = the Hebrew Bible).
In addition, 17 other versions given in the Bible article does not say that.
This sentence is not more than the opinions of scholars who translated Contemporary English Version.
This is an example for show that the scholars who translated the Bible sometimes put their opinions as if the word of God. As a matter of fact, there are hundreds of examples like that throughout the Bible.
In addition, he said that this phrase is not the word of God can not harm the Jewish woman. This means that if a man marry any women Israel is not going to worship foreign gods? In other words, not all women unfaithful Israelites?
Some versions put the following titles as headers by the passage beginning with 1 Kings 11:01: "Solomon Turns from God" or "Solomon's infidelity to God."
In addition, English Translates contemporary version "many foreign women" to "some women", not "weird."
Also the New Century Version translates the "daughter of Pharaoh" to the "daughter of the king of Egypt" in this document, scholars translate to Pharaoh king Egypt. While Pharaoh was the king of Egypt, however, translators must translate the word of God as he is.
In addition, the New Century Version translates "Many foreign women" to "many women who were not of Israel." Again, this is an interpretation of the scholars who translated the New Century version. Of course they are right, because the strange or foreign women were defined as women's Bible of Israel, but this is not the problem.
The point is that you have to be honest, if you translate the Word of God!
New Century Version says, "many women who were not of Israel", not use the word strange or foreign words that are in the 15 other versions given below in this article. In addition, New Century Version says: "Israel" while Israel is not mentioned in the original Hebrew verse.
In addition, the New International Version Reader's says. " Many women besides Pharaoh's daughter were in other lands "do not use the word strange (or foreign word) found in the other 15 versions. In addition, "Other countries" is not in the original Hebrew verse.
On the other hand, the message says that King Solomon was obsessed with women. Pharaoh's daughter was only the first of many foreign women he loved. I do not know why he says that Pharaoh's daughter was the first, although the original Hebrew verse does not say that, also the 17 other versions do not say that.
Compared to the King James Version King James Version New Century Version and 21 King James, is that "foreign women" in King James version became "foreign women" in New King James Version and 21-century King James version. In addition, Sidon Sidon changed.
However, when comparing the American Standard Version Bible with the Americas, is unchanged between the two versions, except the use of "with" instead of "with."
Conclusion:
1) The Bible declares that King Solomon had a multi-company-Nations-Women Affairs. He loved and married many foreign women, an Egyptian Pharaoh's daughter, and women of the Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Sidonie and the Hittites. Despite their wives were 700 or 1000, however, the Bible does not say that he married a Jewish woman.
2) The translators of the 18 versions of the Bible adds 1 Kings 11:01 verse seven words and phrases that are not God's word. I wonder how translators can put words or phrases as being the Word of God, have no fear of the Lord God?
3) This phenomenon of adding statements, phrases or words not the word of God is common in the Bible. Therefore, the Bible is not 100% the word of God.
4) The sentence added in Contemporary English Version the Bible is not God's word can not harm the Jewish woman. Means that if a man marry any women of Israel is not going to worship foreign gods? In other words, no women in Israel are infidels and take their husbands to worship foreign gods.
==================================
On this issue in the Qur'an:
1) It must be stressed that the Quran speaks of the wives of King Solomon.
2) In the translation of the Koran, no one dares to add a word that is not the Word of God.
3) In the Koran, anyone adds a word or phrase of Scripture and says that it is the Word of God, but dwell in the eternal fire in the afterlife.
4) The Quran is 100% of the total Word of the Lord, the Almighty Creator.
5) In the whole Koran, the term "strange woman" is not mentioned in it, all women are equal in their rights and responsibilities without regard to race, color, location, etc.
6) Last but not least, someone says or believes the Great Prophet King Solomon was sinful or infidel dwell in eternal hell in the afterlife. Do not mess with the Prophets of Allah.
==================================
Verse 1 Kings 11:1 in 18 different versions of the Bible
(1) The top two Reina-Valera translation and translation Young's Literal
Rey Valera
But King Solomon loved many foreign women along with the daughter of Pharaoh, women of Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Sidon and the Hittites:
Young's Literal Translation
And the king Solomon loved many foreign women and the daughter of Pharaoh, women of Moab, Ammon, Edom, Sidon, [and] of the Hittites
(2) The following 13 translations used by women foreign rather than foreign women
New International Version
King Solomon, however, loved many foreign women together with the daughter of Pharaoh, Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Sidon and the Hittites.
The Message
King Solomon was obsessed with women. Pharaoh's daughter was only the first of many foreign women he loved, Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Sidon, and Hittite.
Amplified Bible
But King Solomon [challenging] loved many foreign women - the daughter of Pharaoh, women of the Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Sidon and the Hittites.
New Revised Standard
Now King Solomon loved many foreign women. Besides the daughter of Pharaoh, which married women from Moab, Ammon, Edom, Sidon, and among the Hittites.
Darby Translation
But King Solomon loved many foreign women besides Pharaoh's daughter: women of the Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Sidon, Hittites;
Holman Bible Christians
King Solomon loved many foreign women besides Pharaoh's daughter: women Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Sidonia, and the Hittite
New International Version - UK
King Solomon, however, loved many foreign women, besides the daughter of Pharaoh, Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Sidon and the Hittites.
Today's New International Version
King Solomon, not however, loved many foreign women besides Pharaoh's daughter, Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Sidon and the Hittites.
English Version Standard
1Now King Solomon loved many foreign women along with the daughter of Pharaoh, Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Sidon, and Hittite women,
21st Century King James Version
But King Solomon loved many foreign women along with the daughter of Pharaoh: women of the Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites Sidon, and the Hittites,
Version
Now King Solomon loved many foreign women along the daughter of Pharaoh, women of the Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites Sidon, and the Hittites;
New International Version
Now King Solomon loved many foreign women along with the daughter of Pharaoh, Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Sidonia, and Hittite women,
New King James Version
But King Solomon loved many foreign women and the daughter of Pharaoh: women of the Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites Sidon, and the Hittites,
(3) The following three translations used "many women", "some women" and "women" to translate "many strange women, besides the use of words or phrases added.
New Century Version
King Solomon loved many women who were not of Israel. He loved the daughter of the king of Egypt, and women of the Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Sidon and the Hittites.
Reader's New International Version (NIV)
King Solomon loved many women besides Pharaoh daughter. They were in other lands. They were the Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Sidon and the Hittites.
Contemporary English Version
"The Lord wanted the Israelites to worship foreign gods, so they had warned her not to marry someone who was not of Israel. Solomon loved his wife, the daughter of the king of Egypt. But I also loved some women of Moab, Ammon and Edom, Sidon and other land of the Hittites. "
About the Author
Professor Dr. Ibrahim Khalil, Prof. of Clinical and Chemical Pathology, Head (ex-) of Clinical Microbiology and Infection Control Unit, Ain-Shams University. Cairo, Egypt President of the Egyptian Society of Inventors, Honorary President of SPIC-Egypt (The Society of Practitioners of Infection Control – Egypt), Co-Chief Editor of the Egyptian Journal of Lab. Medicine Member of the Egyptian union of Writers, Published 5 Books and some 60 Medical Articles, Supervisors for 79 PhD theses and111 Master Degree theses.
Can anyone help me with this geometric sequence?
Can anyone help me solve this please? An ammonite Fossil is shaped a logarithmic spiral. Yolanda, now a paleontologist, measures distances ties # 2 and # 4 along a radial line from the center of the spiral. She believes that the distances are 6 inches and centimeters 13.5. The fossil is in poor condition and can not measure the distance from the center loop # 3. But it can be calculated. What is the distance in centimeters? Does not include units in your reply.
Let the distance from the center loop # 3 = x. Then 13.5 / X = x / 6 x ^ 2 = 13.5 * 6 = 81 x = 9
This original version of the Ammonite design by Robert Welch for Cambridge Silversmiths is forged from thick stainless steel sheets. Each polished piece has the Ammonite motif stamped on its handle. Spoons and forks are made from 18/0 stainless steel and the knives are forged from a single ingot of especially hardened stainless steel that maintains a cutting edge. Hostess Set Includes: 1 serving s...
We hope you identified the Ammonite you have been looking for today. We show a large range of gemstones such as Ammonite on our site. Everyday we scour the internet to locate the best deals for Ammonite and other gems using our web portals. If for any reason you can"t find what you were searching for today, check out our other pages and categories on the right hand side or use the search box. Thank you for visiting gemstone store.
We hope you identified the Dinosaur Bones or other fossils were looking for today. We show a large range of fossils as Dinosaur Bone. Everyday we scour the internet to find the best buys for Dinosaur Fossils using our portals.
Unexpected Fossil Shark Tooth Megalodon and Angustidens Finds
Mystery charms
Charms the name itself gives a beautiful feeling. History of charms is long lasting. It starts with beautiful funky jewelry. Charms may be reasonable, whimsical, magical, kind or more. These magical pieces offer us love, luck and protection. There are so many things to use as charms from past to present life. Can be
And many more who do not complete the list. Charms are not only beautiful, but had a religious significance magical. Charms reflect the individuality of the user. Now, one day is more individual and transcendent. It can be used differently as a anklet, hold a handbag and hidden in a bag, tied on a keychain, necklaces collection of pets, belt, strap, mobile phone, charms, pendants and more. The bracelets are the best known pieces of jewelry.
The first piece of jewelry is "Snail-shell." He was taken 20,000 years to improve fertility and avoid the evil eye. Fossil fish teeth, is thought to be used to cure dropsy and spleen. He was giving a special protector for a newborn child. "Unicorn horn" is actually the narwhal's horn. Rarely and hard to find and is believed to contain magical properties and can detect poison. "Talisman" is the name given to the piece of jewelry the lucky charms of its charm is as strong as it was for our ancestors. The objects themselves give the magical power of the planetary influences. "Garra de Tigre" is a charm and it is believed that if you use them gives you the power to ward off the evil tiger.
'Rosary' are the types of accounts of things that used in the Catholic Christian. to cure the disease.
'Cruces' are the most beautiful and charming important in the collection of the devotion of thousands of years ago the Greek used to carry crude crosses are the same length. Tsar crosses "are major intersections in London and comes from Russia. "The Cross of Malta was a popular means 800B.C. and Divine Protection and Prosperity." Stars' are the Universal Declaration of the Holy Symbol. In Judas and Islamic culture stars used against misfortune and evil. " Hearts "is the symbol of love. It is a symbol of life, love and feelings. In the 17th century it was believed that the mother leave a baby at the orphanage heart-shaped symbol of the continuation of the maternal presence, and the protection of the future.
Gemstones conveying any sense talking about Amber to Turquoise blue every stone has its own history and association to some or other passion. "Amber" is used in ancient Rome for a sore throat Appeal recently amber beads used for nursing babies to less painful teething and teeth stronger. "lapis lazuli" is considered the stone of friendship and truth. "Esmeralda" in ancient Rome was the color of Venus, The color of beauty and love. 'Ruby' signifies the passion and the fire gives the user a sense of warmth. "Sapphires" are wisdom, compassion, loyalty. "Game" was the stone of bishops and cardinals. Large number of awesome power is attributed to Amethyst. It is believed that if all the worn round the neck protection against snake bites. "Opals" age believed to be used as a healing power. It is also believed that opals are able to solve depression and help users find real true love. "Topaz" comes in many colors and meaning of the reputation for being handsome and intelligent and makes women fertile and happy. Jade is a gemstone with energy. This stone beautiful beautiful is a joy, vivacity and happiness to the wearer. "Corals" and its use have been part of the religious beliefs of the centuries. This is more what in Buddhism, where the revered lamas Coral and use for their rituals. coral stone is helpful for improving self-confidence, administrative capacity and the power of the use of rights in social and political spheres. The 'before' turquoise mines dating back to as early as 3500 Over the years BC, Turquoise has been thought of as a stone with magical properties and ancient folklore tells us that the stone can bring good luck in health, the money and romance.
The language of feelings was still charming 20 century. These are popularly gifted magical trinkets to celebrate marriage with the arrival of the newborn. Aaron Basha United States the company is meant for their baby shoe enamel charms. London link enchanting hung miniature items such as shoes, baby carriage and toy animals. List is endless, but the beauty of these magical charms still ... ... ..
About the Author
I am Meenakshi Baid . Presently working as a position of faculty in Indian Institute Of Gem And Jewellery Jaipur from past four years. I am residing in Jaipur in joint family. I had done my education from Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh(India).Teaching is my passion .
Is it true that the largest fossil Shark Teeth are serrated and serrated teeth evolved?
Evolved because there is some evolutionary advantage sawtooth have?
It is true. Fossil shark teeth are about 420 million years with no serrations. http://www.elasmo-research.org/education/evolution/earliest.htm However, not all species of modern sharks have serrated teeth. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shark_tooth
Dinosaur mouth, head and teeth Light Switch Cover is new and handcrafted utilizing unique process resulting in a stunning high gloss ceramic-like finish. SET OF MATCHING SCREWS IS INCLUDED giving it a perfect finishing touch. Made of durable metal material....
Dinosaur mouth, head and teeth Light Switch Cover is new and handcrafted utilizing unique process resulting in a stunning high gloss ceramic-like finish. SET OF MATCHING SCREWS IS INCLUDED giving it a perfect finishing touch. Made of durable metal material....
Dinosaur mouth, head and teeth Greeting Card is measuring 5.5w x 5.5h. Greeting Cards are sold in sets of 6 or 12. Give these fun cards to your friends and family as gift cards, thank you notes, invitations or for any other occasion. Greeting Cards are blank inside and come with white envelopes....
Dinosaur mouth, head and teeth Greeting Card is measuring 5.5w x 5.5h. Greeting Cards are sold in sets of 6 or 12. Give these fun cards to your friends and family as gift cards, thank you notes, invitations or for any other occasion. Greeting Cards are blank inside and come with white envelopes....
Dinosaur mouth, head and teeth Greeting Card is measuring 5.5w x 5.5h. Greeting Cards are sold in sets of 6 or 12. Give these fun cards to your friends and family as gift cards, thank you notes, invitations or for any other occasion. Greeting Cards are blank inside and come with white envelopes....
We hope you identified the Fossil Teeth you have been looking for today. We show a large range of gemstones such as Fossil Teeth on our site. Everyday we scour the internet to locate the best deals for Fossil Teeth and other gems using our web portals. If for any reason you can"t find what you were searching for today, check out our other pages and categories on the right hand side or use the search box. Thank you for visiting gemstone store.
The extinction of the dinosaurs occurred during the end of the Cretaceous Period, around 65 million years ago, and caused the loss of up to 70 percent of all life on the planet. Although this event was not the only mass extinction in Earth's history or the most severe, dinosaur extinction has spawned a range of theories from the credible to the less than believable.
Ice Age
If an Ice Age occurred during the Cretaceous Period a considerable amount of the planet's water and large areas of land would have been locked in ice. Since dinosaurs were thought to be cold blooded they would probably not have been able to cope with such extreme conditions and their numbers would have eventually dwindled.
Disease
Disease is another suggestion for the extinction of the dinosaurs. It is difficult to see however how one disease could be so prevalent as to wipe out large swathes of the animal population, travel vast distances and kill off both land and marine species as well as plant life.
Climate Change
If a gradual change in the earth's climate occurred with a cooler, drier environment and an adapting plant life, possibly the dinosaurs would not have been able to adapt quickly enough to survive. The Fossil records of dinosaur skulls show they could only have had small brains. This indicates dinosaurs relied on automatic body responses rather than the cognitive, decision making responses warm blooded animals are known to make. Therefore a changing environment could have been difficult for dinosaurs to adapt to and they may not have been able to compete effectively with warm blooded animals.
Supernova
A supernova is a star that explodes with enough energy to keep our sun burning for six billion years. If the Earth was hit by the resulting radiation from a nearby supernova it would have destroyed all dinosaur life. There is no evidence for a supernova causing the extinction of the dinosaurs, and it is difficult to see how anything would have outlived such an event.
The Volcano Theory
It is known that volcanic activity was widespread during the Cretaceous era, and is a credible reason why the dinosaurs became extinct. The Deccan Traps in western India and areas in the Pacific Basin are likely sites for increased volcanic activity at this time.
The consequences of large scale volcanic activity would have led to a nuclear type winter with ash and gasses added to the atmosphere, depleting sunlight and creating difficult conditions for dinosaur species. Hydrochloric acid in particular would have broken down the ozone layer allowing harmful ultraviolet rays to penetrate to the surface.
The high level of volcanic activity would also have emitted large volumes greenhouse gasses such as C02 and methane, increasing the Earth's temperature and drastically changing the planet's climate. The effects on the dinosaurs would have been catastrophic as they struggled to acclimatize to the changing conditions, and large scale extinction of dinosaur species would have been inevitable.
Cretaceous sediments support the theory of volcanic activity as they contain higher than normal concentrations of minerals and sodium, both associated with volcanoes. Cretaceous sediments can also contain volcanic rock.
The Asteroid Theory
In the late 1970's Luis and Walter Alvarez and scientists from the University of California were studying rocks of the K-T boundary (or Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary) in Gubbio, Italy. Within the clay layer of the K-T boundary they discovered concentrations of iridium thirty times higher than normal. The two natural sources of this rare element are asteroids and lava from the Earth's core, which led Luis and Walter Alvarez's team to first suggest an asteroid collided with the Earth causing dinosaur extinction. The Alvarez team estimated the asteroid would need to be ten kilometers in diameter to contain enough iridium to cause the iridium concentrations in the clay layer.
Further evidence to support an asteroid impact has emerged. The K-T boundary has two layers. The upper layer is three millimeters thick and includes soot which is believed to have come from global fires caused by the impact.
The lower level is two millimeters thick and contains ejecta from the asteroid impact site. This includes quartz crystals known as shock crystals which have been physically altered by high temperatures and intense pressure. The layer also contains tektites and micro tektites, which are often made of fused glass. Shocked crystals and tektites are both closely associated with asteroid impact sites.
In 1990 the scientist Alan Hildebrand, after studying data gathered by geophysicists searching for oil, noticed a ring structure called Chicxulub off the Yucatan Peninsula in Mexico. Chicxulub is a crater 180 kilometers in diameter and dates from around 65 million years ago, the same time as the extinction of the dinosaurs. It was estimated that an object ten kilometers in diameter impacting the site would have caused the crater, which fits the Alvarez team's calculations for the size of the asteroid to create the K-T boundary finds.
The Effects Of The Asteroid Impact On The Dinosaurs
It is estimated the speed of the asteroid would have been about 100,000 kilometers per hour and the initial impact would have destroyed everything within a 500 kilometer radius. The intense shock wave that followed would have caused large scale fires, whilst trillions of tons of debris, gas and water vapor would have been thrown into the atmosphere.
Earthquakes, tidal waves, volcanic eruptions as well as high winds would have followed. The soot and debris in the atmosphere would have blocked out the sun for months leading to fluctuating temperatures and severe disruption to photosynthesis. The global fires would have emitted large volumes of CO2, increasing global temperatures and causing a chain reaction that would create sulphur dioxide falling as acid rain.
Fires would have destroyed up to twenty five percent of all vegetation, and with photosynthesis unable to function effectively plant eating dinosaurs would have starved. This in turn would have led to large scale deaths of the carnivores bringing dinosaurs to extinction. Smaller animals such as scavengers and birds that could have traveled longer distances in search for food would have been more likely to have survived.
Effects On Marine Life
The levels of oxygen in the sea would have decreased as deep sea water was dragged to the surface by huge under water currents. Plankton would have died as a consequence leading to a collapse of the food chain and widespread death. Acid rain may also have increased the acidity of the sea, killing vulnerable species.
Problems With The Asteroid Theory
Whilst an asteroid impact has gained ground over most other theories, there still remain problems with the theory. Paleontologists have yet to find dinosaur fossils dating to the time of the impact, and some evidence suggests dinosaurs may have already been extinct before this event. In fact dinosaurs had been steadily declining for tens of thousands of years before the Chicxulub asteroid impacted.
There have been a number of mass extinction events in the Earth's history and a number of large asteroid impacts. However, these impacts have never been the cause of mass extinctions. It is also known that some climate sensitive species such as frogs survived the cretaceous extinction event, bringing into question the true long term effects of the asteroid on the environment.
In spite of these problems with the asteroid theory it is still the strongest explanation for the extinction of the dinosaurs. Perhaps the answer lies not with one explanation for dinosaur extinction but a combination of factors such as the asteroid impacting at a time of increased volcanic activity. In the final analysis, perhaps the extinction of the dinosaurs was a case of an accumulation of badly timed events that very few species could cope with.
About the Author
How old are dinosaur fossils?
My fellow Christians- if the earth is 6000 years old, how can we also maintain that the dinosaurs died out 65 million years ago?
The God I know doesn't deceive anyone. But I have heard a few people explain things that cast doubts on my beliefs. If God created the earth with the dinosaur fossils already embedded in the earth (one contingency), or if the fossils are much younger than they appear to be (another possibility), he may have allowed this to happen in order to test people's faith. Is that synonymous with deception?
Are there serious flaws with radiometric dating techniques?
The flaw in any sort of dating method is the assumptions. When a (secular) scientist discovers a Dinosaur Bone, he already has the date of the bone in his mind. When he takes the bone in to get dated, any dates that may suggest anything different than he is already convinced of is discarded due to "contamination". There are many dating methods which suggest only thousands of years, rather than millions of billions, but these methods are not mentioned by the "respectable" scientific community.
In the end, it's all about a world-view. If a person has an old-earth worldview, he will interpret all evidence to conform to his worldview. Likewise, if a person has a young-earth worldview, he will interpret all evidence to show a young earth. Evidence itself does not point one direction or the other, it is the interpretation of that evidence.
Build your own dinosaur in the sand! This is really a unique idea for a dinosaur toy. It contains 10 plastic molds which are perfect for any sandbox or sand and water table. When finished, it looks just like the dinosaur was recently covered by blowing and drifting sand. The 10 pcs. are together inside of one net bag....
A visit to a dinosaur dig turns exciting when the Magic School Bus becomes a time machine that takes Ms. Frizzle's class back 67 million years, to the time when dinosaurs roamed the Earth. There, they must put aside their prejudices and preconceptions about dinosaurs, as they investigate which are dangerous carnivores, and which are herbivores. By noting their observations in their science journal...
FOSSIL FINDIN' FUN! Start with two children on vacation at the beach with their parents. Add an eccentric, yodeling paleontologist who is as excited about dinosaurs as the children are. Stir gently with a magic spell that brings dinosaurs (who can sing and dance) to life, and you have the makings of a mighty good story. Put that story on an album with catchy tunes and accurate science and you have...
We hope you identified the Dinosaur Fossils you have been looking for today. We show a large range of gemstones such as Dinosaur Fossils on our site. Everyday we scour the internet to locate the best deals for Dinosaur Fossils and other gems using our web portals. If for any reason you can"t find what you were searching for today, check out our other pages and categories on the right hand side or use the search box. Thank you for visiting gemstone store.
The November edition of National Geographic magazine (NG) posed the question "Was Darwin Wrong?" on its front cover. Natural scientist David Quammen, author of the article by the same name, replied "No" to that question from his own perspective, and claimed that Darwin's theory of evolution was today backed up by powerful scientific evidence. Quammen repeated the main claims from Darwin's book The Origin of Species, but overlooked one important detail.
Darwin added another chapter to his book, one called "Difficulties on Theory," and openly admitted the existence of difficulties in these terms:
Such is the sum of the several chief objections and difficulties which may justly be urged against my theory… I have felt these difficulties far too heavily during many years to doubt their weight. 1
The fact is, however, that the NG article discussed not one of the phenomena that Darwin regarded as a problem for his theory, and even ignored their existence. For example, although Darwin referred in his book to the way the fossil record failed to back up his theory and to the complexity in the eye, NG magazine did not even touch on such subjects which the theory of evolution is unable to account for as the Cambrian Explosion, biological complexity and the origin of genetic information.
Quammen, who thus appears to be more of a Darwinist than Darwin himself, emerged as the defender not of a theory that can account for difficulties, but of a "dogma" that needs to be shielded from criticism.
In this article, Quammen's so-called evidence is analysed and the Darwinist propaganda embarked on by NG magazine refuted.
An Example of NG Turkey's Dogmatic Stance
The English language edition of the NG article "Was Darwin Wrong?" also devoted space to Harun Yahya's works about the theory of evolution. In the section describing worldwide reactions against evolution the following words appeared in reference to Harun Yahya:
Their discomfort is paralleled by Islamic creationists such as Harun Yahya, author of a recent volume titled The Evolution Deceit, who points to the six-day creation story in the Koran as literal truth and calls the theory of evolution "nothing but a deception imposed on us by the dominators of the world system."
Interestingly though, Harun Yahya did not appear in NG's Turkish version, and this section was altered, assuming the following form: "This unease displays a parallelism among those who support the Islamic idea of creation."
As someone who states his primary aim as being that of describing the philosophy and scientific invalidity of Darwinism, Harun Yahya has closely monitored Darwinist propaganda in recent years and has responded, in the light of scientific findings, to the pro-evolutionist writings and broadcasts of media organisations, of which NG is one. (see www.darwinism-watch.com)
If Darwinism really were supported by a mass of evidence, as claimed in this NG article, then why is NG Turkey trying to prevent Harun Yahya's scientific criticisms from being heard? Could it be that NG Turkey was concerned that Darwinism will be unable to withstand such scientific criticism? In fact, this attitude by NG's Turkey desk not only shows that the magazine is unwilling to inform its readers of the source of effective criticism of evolution, but also confirms the criticism that it is seeking to keep Darwinism on its feet as an ideology.
NG Is Unwilling to Face the Modern Scientific Facts
There can be no doubt that in order to provide a realistic response to the question "Was Darwin Wrong?" one needs to look at what Darwin actually said and to compare this to modern scientific facts. In his book The Origin of Species, in which he unveiled his theory of evolution, Darwin provided a very important criterion by which to test his theory. So concrete is that criterion that in Darwin's own words it could "absolutely break down" the theory. Darwin wrote:
"If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down." 2
Darwin maintained that organs evolved during a gradual process. Thinking of this imaginary process in reverse, it appears that Darwin assumed that these organs possessed reducibility. However, advances made in the field of biochemistry, especially over the last 40 years, have revealed that the cell possesses a superior complexity, the details of which were unknown in Darwin's time, for which reason it was equated to a "black box," and that certain structures within the cell actually possess the feature of "irreducible complexity."
"Irreducible complexity" is a phenomenon based on empirical evidence and literally constitutes the antithesis of Darwin's theory. The most important figure to bring this concept onto the agenda of the scientific world is the biochemist Michael J. Behe from Lehigh University in the USA. In his 1996 book Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution Behe examines the irreducibly complex natures of the cell and certain other biological structures, and reveals that these cannot possibly be accounted for in terms of evolution. Behe sets out the effect that irreducible complexity has on the claims of Darwinism thus:
"To Darwin, the cell was a 'black box' -- its inner workings were utterly mysterious to him. Now, the black box has been opened up and we know how it works. Applying Darwin's test to the ultra-complex world of molecular machinery and cellular systems that have been discovered over the past 40 years, we can say that Darwin's theory has 'absolutely broken down'." 3
Irreducible complexity has demolished Darwinism, and proved that life is the product of intelligent design, in other words that God has created all living things. The way that NG seeks to keep this from its readers constitutes a flight from reality.
NG's biogeographical tales
In his article in NG, Quammen begins his account of the so-called evidence for Darwinism with biogeography, and it may be of use to provide a description of this concept at this point. Biogeography is a branch of science that investigates the geographical distribution of species and seeks an answer to the question of how they came by these habitat regions by drawing up maps of their locations on the Earth.
Most books in the field of biogeography are full of facts that say nothing, neither in favour nor against, the theory of evolution: such as maps of living species' habitat areas, the features of those areas, questions regarding the spread of organisms, and the grouping together of species on the basis of geographical area ... 4
When their distribution on the Earth is examined it can be seen that species do not generally exhibit a global distribution. Species have rather spread in large groups in areas possessing specific climatic and environmental conditions. Ever since Darwin, evolutionists have sought to portray this spread as evidence for evolution, though with regard to the "fundamental" living categories of geographical distribution their efforts have failed to come up with a consistent evolutionary scenario.
In their book Systematics and Biogeography, G. Nelson and N. Platnick of the New York American Museum of Natural History analysed the studies performed in this field and set out their conclusion:
We conclude, therefore, that biogeography (or geographical distribution of organisms) has not been shown to be evidence for or against evolution in any sense. 5
If evolutionists really wish to offer evidence for their theory then what they need to do is to abandon their fairy tales about "if this living thing is found here then it must have evolved here, and if that living thing is found there then it must have evolved there," and instead scientifically document their own responses to the question of how living things came into being in the first place. (It is an indisputable fact that the mechanisms of random mutation and natural selection cannot account for the origin of species.)
The fact that evolutionist claims based on biogeography are myths devoid of any scientific evidence clearly emerge on inspection of NG's claims about palaeontology. The fossil record clearly reveals that the idea that living things spread by evolving is a myth.
NG's palaeontology deception
NG makes a generalisation about the fossil strata, telling its readers that so-called closely related species are generally found side by side in consecutive strata, and that a life form going back millions of years in one stratum is followed by a similar, though not identical, one in the subsequent stratum. As an example of this generalisation it cites the equine sequence that even evolutionists abandoned years ago; it maintains that the modern-day horse emerged at the end of the sequence Hyracotherium, Orohippus, Epihippus and Mohippus, fossils of which are found in consecutive strata.
What NG is doing here consists of a blatant deception. The equine sequence is an unfounded one, the invalidity of which has now been demonstrated. That being the case, putting it forward as a generalisation regarding the fossil record cannot be described as anything else than an attempt to verify that generalisation with a deceptive example.
Life forms emerged with no evolutionary progenitors, but in a single moment, and with flawless bodily structures
Darwin, who maintained that living things emerged through graduated evolution and who hoped that the fossil record to confirm that claim would be obtained in future excavations, was mistaken. The fossils obtained in endless excavations carried out by palaeontologists all over the world have produced findings that openly refute the idea of gradual change in consecutive strata. These facts concern the phenomena of sudden appearance and stasis.
Species emerge suddenly, with no evolutionary progenitors but with flawless bodily structures. In his 1999 book Fossils and Evolution, Tom Kemp, Curator of the Zoological Collections in Oxford University Museum of Natural History, admits this:
In virtually all cases a new taxon appears for the first time in the fossil record with most definitive features already present, and practically no known stem-group forms. 6
Fossils hundreds of millions of years old that bear no
trace of evolution invalidate neo-Darwinism
Furthermore, species exhibit no gradual change as suggested in the NG generalisation. Species with natural histories of hundreds of millions of years exhibit a "stability" demonstrating a permanency throughout geological strata. The shark, coelacanth, ant, salamander and many other species, fossils of which have been found and which have remained unchanged for hundreds of millions of years, have led to palaeontologists accepting stasis as one of the most striking aspects of the fossil record. This phenomenon refutes Darwinism's prediction of gradual change and invalidates the theory. Professor of Geology Peter J. Williamson describes this in Nature magazine:
The principal problem is morphological stasis. A theory is only as good as its predictions, and conventional neo-Darwinism, which claims to be a comprehensive explanation of evolutionary process, has failed to predict the widespread long-term morphological stasis now recognized as one of the most striking aspects of the fossil record. 7
In short, NG's claim of graduated change throughout geological strata is a myth supported in the face of the science of palaeontology. The way that NG seeks to support that myth with the equine sequence only makes matters worse.
The truth in the equine sequence that NG seeks to conceal from its readers
The equine sequence is based on various hoofed fossils unearthed in North America. Darwinists set these out in such a way as to establish a sequence, according to the fossils' dental characteristics and numbers of toes, and for years put this forward as evidence for Darwinism. Continuing palaeontological excavations, however, definitively revealed the inconsistencies within that series. NG, known for its blind devotion to Darwinism, has no qualms about concealing this development from its readers and writing that the alleged evolutionary ancestors of the horse follow one another in consecutive geological strata.
Former BBC science editor Gordon Rattray Taylor describes how the equine sequence constitutes no evidence for Darwinism:
But perhaps the most serious weakness of Darwinism is the failure of paleontologists to find convincing phylogenies or sequences of organisms demonstrating major evolutionary change... The horse is often cited as the only fully worked-out example. But the fact is that the line from Eohippus to Equus is very erratic. It is alleged to show a continual increase in size, but the truth is that some variants were smaller than Eohippus, not larger. Specimens from different sources can be brought together in a convincing-looking sequence, but there is no evidence that they were actually ranged in this order in time. 8
At a meeting in November 1980 at the Chicago Museum of Natural History, attended by 150 evolutionists, one speaker, Boyce Rensberger, stated that there was no basis in the fossil record for the scenario of equine evolution, and that no gradual equine evolution ever took place:
The popularly told example of horse evolution, suggesting a gradual sequence of changes from four-toed fox-sized creatures living nearly 50 million years ago to today's much larger one-toed horse, has long been known to be wrong. Instead of gradual change, fossils of each intermediate species appear fully distinct, persist unchanged, and then become extinct. Transitional forms are unknown. 9
Discoveries that living things included in the imaginary sequence of equine evolution actually lived at the same time, and even together, totally refute Quammen. One of the most striking examples of this came to light in 1981. Fossils of thousands of living things, 10 million years old, that had been buried under lava as the result of a volcanic eruption and whose skeletons had been preserved down to the present day, were dug up in the US state of Nebraska. With that discovery it emerged that three- and single-toed equines assumed to have lived at different periods and to have ancestral relationships with one another in the framework of evolutionists' imaginary equine sequence, actually lived side by side. Interestingly the source of this information is NG magazine. 10
The myth of whale evolution
I can see no difficulty in a race of bears being rendered, by natural selection, more and more aquatic in their structure and habits, with larger and larger mouths, till a creature was produced as monstrous as a whale. 11
From watching bears fishing along a river bank, Darwin set out his ideas on the origin of whales in these words in his book The Origin of Species, though he elected to remove that section from subsequent editions of the book. Yet evolutionists who came after Darwin had no hesitation over adopting this myth, with various minor amendments, that came down as a monument to the unrestricted nature of his imagination. They continued to propagate the myth that the whale evolved not from the bear but from other land mammals, as if this were a scientific fact.
It can now be seen that NG, one of the main representatives of Darwinian mythology, is behaving no differently, and is seeking to portray this great myth, supported for the sake of the dogma of evolution, as representing evidence for evolution.
There are enormous differences, in terms of such basic physiological characteristics as water conservation, sight and communication, between whales and the land mammals alleged to have been their progenitors. Let us now consider the scientific dilemma facing the myth of evolution by examining the design in whales:
The special water conservation design in whales' bodies
Although they live in water, whales are unable to meet their water requirements from salty sea water. They need fresh water to live. Although it is not known exactly how they meet their water needs, it is thought that a large part of it is obtained by eating sea creatures that contain levels of salt that are 30% lower than those of the ocean water.In such an environment, where fresh water is exceedingly scarce, the maximum conservation of water in living things' bodies and minimum consumption thereof are critical. Water levels are of great importance to whales, for which reason, just like camels, whales do not perspire. Their kidneys regulate urine concentration in such a way as to supply water.
Why is whale milk fatty?
Another delicate balance with regard to water needs appears in the fat level in the female whale's milk. The mother whale feeds her young with a very thick milk, of the consistency of cheese. This milk is ten times fattier than human milk. There is a chemical reason why this milk contains such a high level of fat. Water is produced as a side product as fat is processed after being consumed by the baby. In this way the mother meets her offspring's need for water with minimal water loss.
The design in whales' eyes
There are complex arrangements in the design of the whale eye and its communication systems, no examples of which are to be found in terrestrial mammals. Land mammals have eyelids to protect against dust and impact. Whales, on the other hand, have a hard layer to protect against a different danger, the pressure under the sea. Moreover, the refractive index in the design of the whale eye makes it possible for a killer whale to leap up and catch a fish six metres above the water level in an amusement park with considerable accuracy. In addition, whales' eyes are on either side of the head, unlike terrestrial mammals, thus protecting them from the current. Thanks to the levels of rod and cone cells in the eye, their sensitivity levels to light, colour and other details are very high. In addition to that ratio, the presence of phosphorus in the eyes is a design that facilitates their ability to see in the dark depths of the oceans.
The mathematical calculation employed by whales
The sense used by whales in the location of sources of food and of one another is not actually sight, but rather hearing. Many whales hunt at the dark regions at the bottom of the sea thanks to a form of natural "sonar." The whale's brain emits clicking sounds, in a way not yet fully understood by scientists. The distance of an object is determined by means of a mathematical calculation. The whale brain multiplies the speed at which the sounds it emits strike an object and bounce back by the time necessary for this, and divides the result by two. The result is the distance of the object from itself. Furthermore, the whale also possesses the ability to focus the sound waves with its brain on a specific point and to emit these like a light impulse. The returning waves are analysed and interpreted in the animal's brain. This interpretation determines the shape of the body in front of it, its size, speed and position. The animal's skull is sound-proofed to protect it from the bombardment of powerful sound waves it constantly emits and which could even seriously damage the brain itself. The sonic system in the animal is unbelievably sensitive, so much so that the US Navy imitates the sonar design in sea mammals in developing its own technology. 12
Special designs for whale calves
The perfect designs in whales are by no means limited to these. The shape of a whale calf's mouth has been designed in such a way as to be ideally suited to fit its mother's teats, so that the calf is able to suckle without losing a drop of milk and without taking in a drop of sea water. Moreover, they possess lungs capable of storing high levels of oxygen for protracted dives and an ear membrane designed to protect them from high pressure.
These arrangements, every one of which indicates an evident design, are particular to whales and are not to be found in any terrestrial mammal. NG, however, expects it readers to set reason aside and believe that these all came about by chance. NG denies that whales were intelligently designed, maintaining instead that one fine day a land mammal decided to live in the sea, and that the whale evolved as the result of unconscious mechanisms such as random mutations and natural selection.
Yet what mutation could possibly produce sonar in a mammal that was allegedly the progenitor of the whale? Bearing in mind the effect of mutations and the importance of the brain to the whale's survival, it is clear that mutations would damage the brain, crippling or killing the whale. Could the brain, that produces sound waves, be able to focus these on a particular point and determine the location of objects using a mathematical calculation, acquire a perfect sonar in an area that would be damaged during this random process? By what coincidence could it produce sonar of such a high quality that even the US Navy's technology development units have been unable to match it? What mutations could turn a land mammal's feet into fins and a tail capable of propelling several tons of weight?
There is no doubt that these questions may also be asked with regard to the systems that make it possible to use water so productively, the suckling system and the protective systems in the eye and ear. However, NG has no reasonable response to give to these questions. There is but one answer. Whales were created fully formed in a single moment. God created whales to be flawless, endowed with all the systems for their needs, just as He did all other living things. In one verse of the Qur'an it is revealed that:
Mankind! remember God's blessing to you. Is there any creator other than God providing for you from heaven and earth? There is no god but Him. So how have you been perverted? (Qur'an, 35: 3)
(For a more detailed reply to NG's fantastical whale story see http://www.harunyahya.com/70national_geographic_sci29.php)
NG's error regarding embryology
Another error in Quammen's article in NG is the repetition of a myth once known as the "law of recapitulation." This belonged to the German biologist Ernst Haeckel and in his claim regarding embryology Darwin was to a large extent "inspired" by Haeckel. The law of recapitulation maintains that the embryological development of living things repeats the imaginary stages undergone during the descent of the alleged evolutionary ancestors.
The fact that Quammen devotes space to this in his article reveals a wide gap of knowledge on his part. Objections along the lines that Haeckel's claims were devoid of any scientific justification and that the evidence he offered was forged began 136 years ago13, and the end of the law of recapitulation as the subject of scientific debate came as far back as 80 years ago 14. Even George Gaylord Simpson, one of the founders of neo-Darwinism, admitted this fact 42 years ago in the words:
Haeckel misstated the evolutionary principle involved. It is now firmly established that ontogeny does not repeat phylogeny. 15
Moreover, the myth of recapitulation, which NG has no qualms over recapitulating itself, involves what one British embryologist referred to in 1997 as "the best known fraud in the history of biology." In his book Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte (The History of Natural Creation), written in 1868, Haeckel deliberately distorted the pictures of human, monkey and dog embryos in such a way as to support his claim.
One striking aspect of this fraud is that it also constitutes a "centennial monument" to Darwinist dogmatism. Until recently, a number of Darwinist sources, including text books, continued either to use the counterfeit drawings as they were, or else to repeat the myth of recapitulation. The Harvard University professor and evolutionist Stephen Jay Gould displayed great common sense and offered the following criticism:
… [W]e do, I think, have the right to be both astonished and ashamed by the century of mindless recycling that has led to the persistence of these drawings in a large number, if not a majority, of modern textbooks! 16
NG has not used counterfeit drawings. Yet it has no hesitations over using recapitulation, the invalidity of which emerged at least 80 years ago, as support for Darwinism.
We urge NG to consider Stephen Jay Gould's words.
NG's errors with regard to morphology
Quammen exhibits a most thought-provoking attitude in that section in which he deals with Darwin's claims on the subject of morphology. The way that a zoo is organised into birds, monkeys, big cats, crocodiles or fish in the aquarium is interpreted as evidence for evolution. According to Quammen, the fact that living things can be classified under a hierarchical system in families, orders and kingdoms must be the product of an evolutionary process.
However, Quammen's portrayal of hierarchical classification as evidence for evolution is nonsensical. That is because the fact that forms of life can be classified hierarchically is not a prediction first put forward by evolutionists and then subsequently confirmed. The Swedish scientist Carl Linnaeus, the father of the modern system of classification, was a scientist who believed in creation from nothing and regarded that classification as the product of intelligent design. That is compatible with what we see with our own eyes and is grounded in common sense. The ability to be hierarchically classified is a well known hallmark of intelligent design. Means of transport, for example, can be classified as land, air and sea vehicles, and may be broken down into subcategories and even smaller subgroups. Yet this classification does not show that the modes of transport in question came into being through evolution.
Indeed, in an article published in the magazine New Scientist, the prominent evolutionist Mark Ridley makes the following statement:
The simple fact that species can be classified hierarchically into genera, families, and so on, is not an argument for evolution. It is possible to classify any set of objects into a hierarchy whether their variation is evolutionary or not. 17
Quammen's preconception
In the same way that what Quammen writes on this subject are far from supporting his claim, it also reveals how he relies on preconceptions rather than scientific evidence:
Such a pattern of tiered resemblances?groups of similar species nested within broader groupings, and all descending from a single source?isn't naturally present among other collections of items. You won't find anything equivalent if you try to categorize rocks, or musical instruments, or jewelry. Why not? Because rock types and styles of jewelry don't reflect unbroken descent from common ancestors. Biological diversity does. The number of shared characteristics between any one species and another indicates how recently those two species have diverged from a shared lineage. (p. 13)
Quammen placed the hierarchical categorisation in living things in a separate place, on the grounds that it reflects a continual chain of descent from a common ancestor. That term, however, is helpless labelling in Quammen's desperate attempts to prove Darwin right.
As is made clear above, there is no fossil record capable of being proposed as evidence of any evolutionary link between living categories. The words of the prominent evolutionary palaeontologist Stephen Jay Gould that "The evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches" are an admission of the fact that there is actually no evidence for the evolutionary links assumed to exist among living things. 18
In short, the origin of the evolutionary chain of descent that Quammen claims exists among living categories is not scientific fact such as the fossil record, but rather his own dogmatic mentality.
The five-digit skeletal structure error
Quammen maintains that the way that various vertebrates such as the bat, the dolphin and human beings all share the feature of having five digits stems from descent from a common ancestor. This claim rests on the fact that although there is the same basic plan in the front and rear legs of the living things in question, these can still be easily differentiated (the homological claim). This claim of Quammen's can of course only deceive those readers who are unaware of the facts of modern science. Advances in the field of molecular biology definitively invalidate this morphology-based claim. One striking discovery that led to this is that the production of these organs, assumed to be a legacy from a common ancestor, is in fact controlled by different genes in different creatures.
The evolutionary biologist William Fix describes the collapse of the evolutionary thesis concerning pentadactylism (having five digits) in this area in the face of this discovery:
The older textbooks on evolution make much of the idea of homology, pointing out the obvious resemblances between the skeletons of the limbs of different animals. Thus the `pentadactyl' limb pattern is found in the arm of a man, the wing of a bird, and flipper of a whale, and this is held to indicate their common origin. Now if these various structures were transmitted by the same gene couples, varied from time to time by mutations and acted upon by environmental selection, the theory would make good sense. Unfortunately this is not the case. Homologous organs are now known to be produced by totally different gene complexes in the different species. The concept of homology in terms of similar genes handed on from a common ancestor has broken down. 19
NG's vestigial Darwinism
Quammen displays a striking determination not to grasp the fact that Darwin's claims have been demolished by modern science. One of the indications of this is his repetition of the claim regarding vestigial organs, a claim which is utterly illusory. It is maintained in the article that organs such as the male nipple, structures claimed to be the vestiges of rear legs in certain snakes, or the covered wings in coleoptera that are not actually used, are redundant, functionless organs left over from the evolutionary process. Quammen is clearly ignoring the definitive results from scientific developments:
The list of up to 180 supposed vestigial organs at the beginning of the 20th century eventually shrank to almost none in the face of discoveries from scientific research. One by one it emerged that a great many organs, such as the appendix and the plica semilunaris, once supposed to be vestigial organs, do actually have functions.20 "Science" is in any case the process by which human beings come to know what was previously unknown. The gradual emergence of the functions of organs that were once regarded as vestigial shows that, logically, the functions of the last few remaining organs whose functions are still unknown will soon be revealed.
Indeed, a great many present-day evolutionists have admitted that the myth of "vestigial organs" is an argument rooted in ignorance. In an article headed "Do Vestigial Organs Represent Evidence for Evolution?" published in the journal Evolutionary Theory, the evolutionary biologist S. R. Scadding admits this fact:
Since it is not possible to unambiguously identify useless structures, and since the structure of the argument used is not scientifically valid, I conclude that 'vestigial organs' provide no special evidence for the theory of evolution. 21
Evolutionists' claim on the subject of vestigial organs stem not from any vestigialism in these organs, but from the vestigial nature of their own perspectives. The existence of any living thing proves only the existence of God, its creator. The way that inanimate and unconscious atoms combine to produce a hearing, smelling, touching and seeing human being is proof of God's flawless creation. That it is because it is impossible for atoms, which cannot smell, hear or see, to wish to have perception and to combine together for that purpose. For a collection of matter to stand and look at itself in front of a mirror, or for matter to taste and touch itself, has no place in evolutionary logic. These feelings can only be explained in terms of a superior creation, in other words the existence of God and His flawless creation. Despite this self-evident truth, evolutionists hold to the irrational and blind belief that they themselves are the product of matter and blind chance, which shows that their claim regarding vestigial organs is one based on this prejudiced and dogmatic perspective.
The realisation that the organs regarded by evolutionists as vestigial do actually have functions is a proof of this. For example, the structures portrayed as the vestiges of rear legs in certain species of snake are now known to help them to grip one another during mating. To regard the male nipple as the product of an evolutionary process also rests on a distorted logic. If the male nipple were a leftover from an evolutionary process then males must have evolved from a population consisting solely of females, which is a scenario so unimaginable that no evolutionist has felt able to accept it. Coleoptera, another example cited by Quammen, also constitute no evidence for evolution. Insect species which do not develop a functional wing are generally seen in open habitats with strong winds, such as ocean islands. In an environment where strong winds blow and surrounded by large masses of water, insects' being able to fly is by no means an advantage, and may even represent a danger. That is because insects flying in the air are exposed to the effects of the wind and can be hurled into trees or rocks, ending up crippled or dead. There may, therefore, have been a tendency for them to move towards a ground-based lifestyle. Over time, the insect population that lives near the ground comes to consist of individuals that do not develop fully fledged wings. That is because, unlike flying insects, mutations that prevent insects that live near to ground level developing wings may not be damaging to the insect (on the provision that they do not cause a total interruption in its physiology).
A mutation that prevented wing development in a flying insect living in a habitat uninfluenced by winds would be harmful and maybe even lethal. That is because normally an insect that uses its wings to feed and to avoid predators would possess functionless wings because of that mutation and would be unable to survive and thus eliminated from the population.
On the other hand, in insects living in a habitat affected by winds and that used their feet to move about in the same way as non-flying insects, a mutation in the wings might not have lethal consequences. That is because the insect will already have grown accustomed to a life style in which it does not use wings, and it will make no difference whether its wings are healthy or else lose their function due to mutation (as long as the mutation in question is not one that affects the insect's general physiology). In short, a destructive mutation leading to the loss of an insect's wings may not be lethal in an environment where wings are in any case of no consequence.
However, it cannot be said that the coleoptera that are assumed to have undergone such a process represent evidence of evolution. The theory of evolution proposes that organs gradually assume a more complex form. The genetic change proposed in support of this claim must be of such a kind as to add new genetic information to creatures' DNA. It is evident, however, that coleoptera do not gain any new genetic information during this process and that, on the contrary, they suffer a loss of information in the genes that control wing development.
Can this acquisition of genetic information, which is not seen in coleoptera, be observed in any other living thing? Definitely not. Evolutionists have been unable to show the emergence of a new organ, or even a new protein, by means of random mutations.
In short, the theory of evolution maintains that living things acquire new organs with the addition of new genetic information to their DNA, but the vestigial organ argument is one that concerns a loss of function, in other words a loss of genetic data. Therefore, vestigial organs provide no scientific support for the theory of evolution. The reason for evolutionists' determination to place this claim on the scientific agenda is psychological rather than scientific. Their display of blind devotion to materialism leads them to adopt a vestigial perspective towards the evident truth of creation. (You can read Harun Yahya's article that demolishes evolutionists' vestigial viewpoint here. http://www.darwinism-watch.com/hurriyet_science0407.php)
James P. Gills, M.D., founder of St. Luke's Cataract and Laser Institute in Tarpon Springs, Florida, is a creationist scientist. He is also a world-renowned ophthalmologist. In his book Darwinism Under the Microscope, Gills cites a great many proofs of creation that totally undermine evolution, and writes that the only reason why scientists still insist on evolution is the spiritual cataract of thinking of themselves as the product of blind chance. 22
The error of thinking that resistance to antibiotics and DDT is evidence of evolution
The NG article seeks to show that bacterial immunity to antibiotics and insects' resistance to such pesticides as DDT constitutes evidence for evolution. On the subject of the resistance that microbes appear to develop to drugs Quammen confidently states:
There's no better or more immediate evidence supporting the Darwinian theory than this process of forced transformation among our inimical germs. (p. 21)
However, Quammen's excitement in portraying bacterial immunity as evidence for evolution is totally misplaced. It is explained below why these two phenomena do not represent evidence for Darwinism.
The first of the "deadly molecules" employed against micro-organisms was penicillin, discovered by Alexander Fleming in 1928. Fleming discovered a molecule that killed the Staphylococcus mould bacterium, after which antibiotics taken from micro-organisms were used against various bacteria. Although it appeared at first that definitive results had been obtained, the truth later emerged: bacteria gradually acquire resistance to antibiotics. The great majority of bacteria exposed to antibiotics die, but since a small minority remain unaffected this rapidly multiply and eventually come to constitute the entire population. Thus the entire population becomes resistant to the antibiotic.
However, there is no question of bacteria developing through mutation here, because the bacteria already possess the characteristics in question before being exposed to antibiotics. Despite being an evolutionist publication, Scientific American magazine admitted these facts in its March 1998 edition:
Many bacteria possessed resistance genes even before commercial antibiotics came into use. Scientists do not know exactly why these genes evolved and were maintained. 23
Insects acquire resistance to pesticides such as DDT in the same way, and, again in the same way, this represents no evidence for evolution.
The prominent evolutionary biologist Francisco Ayala accepts the truth of this in the words:
The genetic variants required for resistance to the most diverse kinds of pesticides were apparently present in every one of the populations exposed to these man-made compounds. 24
One of those to carry out the most detailed research on this subject is the Israeli biophysicist Dr. Lee Spetner. In his book Not by Chance, published in 1997, Spetner showed that bacterial immunity is brought about by two different mechanisms, but that these offer no support for the theory of evolution. For more detail on this subject see http://www.harunyahya.com/20questions05.php#q19 and http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/embryology_01.html)
Another so-called piece of evidence in the NG article, in addition to the resistance in bacteria and insects, concerns genetic similarities.
The deception that evolution can be observed
NG claims that evolution can actually be witnessed in nature and in the laboratory. This, however, is a fantastical and groundless claim. In an article titled "How Are New Species Formed?" published in the 14 June, 2003, edition of New Scientist, George Turner made the following significant "admission":
Not long ago, we thought we knew how species formed. We believed that the process almost always started with complete isolation of populations. It often occurred after a population had gone through a severe "genetic bottleneck," as might happen after a pregnant female was swept off to a remote island and her offspring mated with each other. The beauty of this so-called "founder effect" model was that it could be tested in the lab. In reality, it just didn't hold up. Despite evolutionary biologists' best efforts, nobody has even got close to creating a new species from a founder population. What's more, as far as we know, no new species has formed as a result of humans releasing small numbers of organisms into alien environments. 25
As we have seen, evolutionists do not actually know how new species are formed. In other words, Quammen's claim about being able to witness evolution in action is totally unfounded. The fact that the long years of study carried out by the Grants into chaffinch beak lengths on the Galapagos islands is cited in support is the result of Darwinism misrepresenting variations to represent evidence for itself. (For further information, see http://www.harunyahya.com/nas04.php)
Conclusion
As we have seen, Darwin was wrong. National Geographic's posing the question whether he was wrong is as ridiculous as asking "Was Freud wrong?" or "Was Marx wrong?" That is because, like Freudianism and Marxism, Darwinism is a theory that has come to the end of its life. We call upon NG magazine to abandon its support for this outdated myth and to accept that creation is the true origin of life.
What NG needs to do is to set its preconceptions to one side and cease supporting Darwinism as a dogma, and to face up to the scientific evidence that undermines this theory. Discoveries in the last 40 years in particular have definitively revealed the invalidity of the naturalist philosophy at the heart of Darwinism. If NG does face up to that fact it will see that the organised complexity of life and the genetic information on which it depends point to intelligent design, in other words that life did not evolve on its own through chance and natural events, but was "created."
NG - and all other Darwinists - have so far avoided facing up to this, and may therefore have resorted to covering up the difficulties facing their theory. Yet they must be aware that this avoidance will be of no use in keeping their theory alive. That is because a major development in the world of science is serving notice that the age of sweeping matters under the carpet has come to an end.
The way that the intelligent design movement, that has been sweeping through the USA over the last 10 years, has one by one unmasked the dogmas of Darwinism, has made it the focus of wide interest. The intellectual basis of this movement is the "Theory of Intelligent Design." The theory in question maintains that complex biological structures containing large amounts of information can only be explained in terms of intelligence-based causes, and that these causes can be empirically studied in the field of biology. 26
One indication that the intelligent design movement may represent the dynamic for major cultural changes is the way it is effectively and in a widespread manner revealing that the evidence for so long taught as evidence for Darwinism in schools actually consists of mythology, deception, misrepresentation and even fraud. California Berkeley University's Professor Phillip E. Johnson, the leader of the movement, stresses that Darwinism will pass into the dustbin of history sometime in this century. 27
It will be of use here to remind NG of the damage from a determined persistence in its policy of uncritical defence of Darwinism. It will be remembered that NG announced the discovery of the Archaeoraptor fossil discovered in China as definitive proof that birds evolved from dinosaurs, without waiting for it to be described in referred scientific journals. Later, however, it was realised that the fossil did not represent a missing link at all, but was a counterfeit "produced" by a Chinese peasant.26 Because of its blind devotion to Darwinism NG had no hesitation in embracing this fossil as "proof" by unscientific methods, and later found itself in "modern paleontology's greatest embarrassment." 29
According to the ornithologist Dr. Storrs Olson, "National Geographic has reached an all-time low for engaging in sensationalistic, unsubstantiated, tabloid journalism." 30
The portrayal of the claim of recapitulation, which died at least 80 years ago, as evidence for evolution in NG's article "Was Darwin Wrong" shows that it is devoid of the seriousness required by science and is continuing with its "unsubstantiated, tabloid journalism." NG is not behaving intelligently. Maintaining this approach does not provide any support for Darwinism. On the contrary, NG is documenting its own dogmatism in an ever more obvious way.
We invite NG to consider these points and to accept that creation is the true origin of life.
There is no doubt that the Lord of all living things, on Earth, in the Sky, and between, is God. In one verse of the Qur'an God reveals that:
Your God is One God. There is no god but Him, the All-Merciful, the Most Merciful. (Qur'an, 2: 163)
Under the pen name of Harun Yahya, Adnan Oktar has written some 250 works. His books contain a total of 46,000 pages and 31,500 illustrations. Of these books, 7,000 pages and 6,000 illustrations deal with the collapse of the Theory of Evolution. You can read, free of charge, all the books Adnan Oktar has written under the pen name Harun Yahya on these websites www.harunyahya.com
1. Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, Electronic Text Center, University of Virginia Library.
2. Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species: A Facsimile of the First Edition, Harvard University Press, 1964, p. 189.
3. Michael Behe, Darwin's Black Box, 1996
4. For more information about the evolutionist theses on biogeography, please see Walter J. Remine, “The Biotic Message: Evolution Versus Message Theory”, Saint Paul Science; 1st ed edition, 1993. page 538.
5. G. Nelson & N. Platnick, Systematics and Biogeography: Cladistics and Vicariance, Columbia University Press, 1981, p. 223.
6. Fossils and Evolution, Dr TS Kemp - Curator of Zoological Collections, Oxford University, Oxford University Press, 1999, p. 246.
7. Peter G. Williamson, "Morphological stasis and developmental constraint: real problems for neo-Darwinism," Nature, vol. 294, 19 November 1981, p. 214; Stephen E. Jones, http://members.iinet.net.au/~sejones/
8. Gordon Rattray Taylor, The Great Evolution Mystery, Abacus, Sphere Books, London, 1984, p. 230.
9. Boyce Rensberger, Houston Chronicle, November 5, 1980, p. 15.
10. Voorhies M.R., "Ancient Ashfall Creates a Pompei of Prehistoric Animals," National Geographic, Vol. 159, No. 1, January 1981, pp.67-68,74 ; "Horse Find Defies Evolution" Creation Ex Nihilo 5(3):15, January 1983, http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/3723.asp
11. Charles Darwin, On the Origin of Species: A Facsimile of the First Edition, Harvard University Press, 1964, p. 184.
12. Spotting Mines With Dolphin Sonar , ScienceNOW 1998: 2
13 L. Rutimeyer, "Referate," Archiv fur Anthropologie, 1868
14 Keith S. Thompson, "Ontogeny and Phylogeny Recapitulated", American Scientist, vol. 76, May / June 1988, p. 273
15 G. G. Simpson, W. Beck, An Introduction to Biology, Harcourt Brace and World, New York, 1965, p. 241.
16 Stephen Jay Gould, "Abscheulich! - Atrocious! - the precursor to the theory of natural selection," Natural History, March 2000, p. 45.
17 Mark Ridley, "Who Doubts Evolution?" New Scientist, vol. 90 (25 June 1981), p. 832.
18 Gould S.J, "Evolution's Erratic Pace," Natural History, May 1977, p. 13-14.
19 William Fix, The Bone Peddlers: Selling Evolution, Macmillan Publishing Co., New York, 1984, p. 189.
20 J. Bergman & G. Howe, Vestigial Organs are Fully Functional, CRS Books, Terre Haute, IN, 1990.
21 S. R. Scadding, "Do 'Vestigial Organs' Provide Evidence for Evolution?," Evolutionary Theory, vol. 5, May 1981, p. 173.
22 James P.Gills, M.D. & Thomas Woodward, Ph.D., Darwinism under the Microscope, Charisma House, 2002, p. 39.
23 Stuart B. Levy, "The Challenge of Antibiotic Resistance," Scientific American, March 1998, p. 35
24 Francisco J.Ayala, "The Mechanisms of Evolution," Scientific American, vol. 239, September 1978, p. 64
25 George Turner, "How Are New Species Formed?," New Scientist, vol. 178, issue 2399, 14 June 2003, p. 36
27 Phillip E. Johnson, "Mothballed Science," Touchstone Magazine, December 2003
28 For more information about Archaeoraptor forgery, please see http://www.harunyahya.com/20questions03.php#q7
29 Tim Friend, "The 'missing link' fossil that wasn't", USA Today, 02/01/2000
30 Open Letter to National Geographic Society by Storrs L. Olson, Curator of Birds, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution
About the Author
ABOUT THE AUTHOR, HARUN YAHYA
Born in Ankara in 1956, Adnan Oktar writes his books under the pen name of Harun Yahya. Ever since his university years, he has dedicated his life to telling of the existence and oneness of Almighty Allah, and to disseminating the moral values of the Qur'an. He has never wavered in the face of difficulties and despite oppression, still continues this intellectual struggle today exhibiting great patience and determination. For mor information pls visit: http://www.harunyahya.com/theauthor.php
Plant-eating crocodiles in the fossil record? Found where?
I heard about them years ago, that they were found in strata that placed them after the Cretaceous. I would be most interested to know whether they evolved only in isolated places like S.America when it was surrounded by ocean, or Madagascar -- just like giant birds. It would support the extinction theory I wrote about at dinotheorist.com.
"The reported find of a fossilised herbivorous crocodyliform (Wu, 1995) is almost as surprising as finding a herbivorous member of the Cat Family. Crocodiles are perceived as reptilian predators par excellence in the popular mind. From diagnostic features in the teeth, the "first known herbivorous member of that group" has been identified, named Chimaerasuchus paradoxus."
Imagine a crocodile almost as long as Tyrannosaurus Rex and just as fierce. That's SuperCroc, the giant Sarcosuchus fossil discovered by Paul Sereno, a National Geographic Explorer-in-Residence. Crocodiles and their ancestors are some of the most successful animals that ever lived. At the time of T. Rex, crocs ranged in size from 2 feet long to over 40 feet long. They lived on land, in swamps, and...
We hope you identified the Fossil Crocodile you have been looking for today. We show a large range of gemstones such as Fossil Crocodile on our site. Everyday we scour the internet to locate the best deals for Fossil Crocodile and other gems using our web portals. If for any reason you can"t find what you were searching for today, check out our other pages and categories on the right hand side or use the search box. Thank you for visiting gemstone store.
Petrified Wood in the San Jacinto River, Conroe, Texas
Why Beachcombing Is Needed For A Healthy Life
I really enjoy beachcombing and hunting fossils. As I am walking along the beach listening to the sounds of seagulls screaming against the roaring surf, soaking up the warm sun, I look down and find a sharks tooth gleaming in the sand! What is there not to enjoy about this! For the health conscious, walking a few miles up and down a beach is also a good way to lose weight.
I like hunting fossils at Myrtle Beach, Edisto Beach and Hunting Island all in South Carolina. I was able to go to Myrtle Beach this past January for a few days. I found quite a few sharks teeth, some petrified wood and several fossilized clams.
It is not too difficult to see a sharks tooth lying in the sand, you just need to take your time as you walk the beach. Finding the fossilized clams are a little more difficult. They look similar to just a black or gray rock; in fact, I pick up many rocks thinking they could be a clam. When you do find one, it is very easy to identify – it looks just like a closed clam shell! I have pictures of some fossilized clams on my website. The petrified wood looks just like bits of wood only black in color. It is interesting to pick up what appears to be a bit of wood but it is as hard as a rock.
If this sounds like a boring hobby, on your next trip to the coast, give it a try and I think you will be amazed at how relaxing yet exciting Fossil hunting is.
About the Author
My name is Robert K. Moore and I am an instructor at Piedmont Technical College. I teach electronics and Mechatronics Technology classes. My hobbies include working with a 1962 Chevy II convertible, hunting fossils, particularly sharks teeth and working with electronics. Visit my sites for more articles about these topics. http://www.saturdayafternoonhobbies.com or http://www.asmartweightlossprogram.com
Is it possible for wood to become petrified in less than 2000 years?
An answer I received stated that the wood foundations of Venice are petrified. How is that possible so quickly?
Making the most of the natural beauty of petrified wood, Janice Minor creates serving pieces that prove the strength of simplicity. The petrified wood she uses is found in abundance in the Philippines. Because these are created using natural elements, e......
Making the most of the natural beauty of petrified wood, Janice Minor creates serving pieces that prove the strength of simplicity. The petrified wood she uses is found in abundance in the Philippines. Because these are created using natural elements, e......
Making the most of the natural beauty of petrified wood, Janice Minor creates serving pieces that prove the strength of simplicity. The petrified wood she uses is found in abundance in the Philippines. Because these are created using natural elements, e......
The Tullis Petrified Wood Vessel Sink will be the focal point of your bathroom, with its detailed organic exterior and black interior. This unique sink features a rounded, triangular shape. Pair with a wall mount faucet or a single hole vessel filler. Upon purchasing, you will receive the sink shown in the photographs. Every sink is a one-of-a-kind piece of art. The images and measurements shown o...
Stone Sinks Petrified Wood Vessel SinkYou will probably be the only person in the neighborhood with a sink made of petrified wood.Features:Natural Petrified WoodHand Carved From Natural StoneTopmount installation1.5 drain sizePolished finishChamfer polished edgesDue to the use of hand-carved natural stone, all weights and dimensions may vary in the actual fixture. Colors of the actual bowls will v...
The natural Feyhurst Petrified Wood Vessel Sink will be the highlight of your bathroom, with the dark crevasse featured on the light gray exterior of one side. Upon purchasing, you will receive the sink shown in the images. Complete the look with a single hole vessel filler or a wall mount faucet. Every sink is a one-of-a-kind piece of art. The images and measurements shown on this page are specif...
We hope you identified the Petrified wood you have been looking for today. We show a large range of gemstones such as Petrified wood on our site. Everyday we scour the internet to locate the best deals for Petrified wood and other gems using our web portals. If for any reason you can"t find what you were searching for today, check out our other pages and categories on the right hand side or use the search box. Thank you for visiting gemstone store.
US $7.99
I <3 old bottles. you should check out a vintage store or online site ... 
